Wed. Sep 18th, 2019

Gwyn Morgan: Speak about ‘collusion’: How foreign-backed anti-oil activists infiltrated Canada’s authorities

From The Monetary Submit

Particular to Monetary Submit  Gwyn Morgan

Canadians watching Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference within the 2016 U.S. election is likely to be tempted to seek out consolation of their certainty that such international interference might by no means occur right here.

Besides it already has. And whereas the Russian authorities at the very least denies interfering in American political affairs, the perpetrators who meddled in Canadian elections have publicly trumpeted their success in devising and executing their plan aimed toward serving to elect who they wished.

This story has all the weather of a fiction novel. Sadly it’s actual

This story has all the weather of a fiction novel. Sadly it’s actual. Piece by meticulously researched piece, B.C.-based impartial researcher Vivian Krause spent virtually 10 years exposing the story. Each element has been corroborated, together with with American and Canadian tax information, along with paperwork and statements from the perpetrators themselves.

The story begins in 2008, when a bunch of radical American anti-fossil-fuel NGOs created their “Tar Sands Marketing campaign Technique 2.1” designed explicitly “to landlock the Canadian oil sands by delaying or blocking the enlargement or growth of key pipelines.” A listing of key strategic targets included: “educating and organizing First Nations to problem building of pipelines throughout their conventional territories” and bringing “a number of actions in Canadian federal and provincial courts.” A “elevating the negatives” part contains recruiting celeb spokes-persons equivalent to Leonardo Di Caprio to “lend their model to opponents of tar sands and producing a excessive unfavorable media profile for tar sands oil.”

What would develop into a massively disruptive intrusion into Canadian affairs would take years and a big sum of money. Enter the Rockefeller Basis, the Hewlett Basis, and the David and Lucile Packard Basis. They, together with environmentalist charities, poured lots of of tens of millions of dollars into the U.S.-based Tides Basis, a murky group that gives cowl as a authorized laundering service that may funnel donations into activist teams, with out revealing the supply.

Impartial researcher Vivian Krause uncovered proof of a U.S. led inexperienced marketing campaign to landlock Alberta oil. Shaughn Butts / Postmedia

Since each American and Canadian tax legal guidelines require charities to doc receipt and disbursement of funds, Krause was in a position to collect irrefutable proof that tens of tens of millions of dollars have been transferred from Tides U.S. to its Tides Canada affiliate. Furthermore, Krause was in a position to acquire 70 protecting letters exhibiting the recipients and the way they used the funds.

They went in the direction of mobilizing First Nations in opposition to the concern of oil spills, together with funds to assist construct “indigenous solidarity resistance to pipeline routes,” to keep up “opposition to grease tankers” and to “present authorized help for actions constraining tar sands growth.” Funding additionally went to the Nice Bear Initiative Society to construct help for designating the so-called “Spirit Bear” habitat as a nature reserve.

Funds went to the Pembina Institute to “advance…the narrative that oil sands enlargement is problematic”; to Greenpeace Canada “for occasions to indicate opposition to pipelines and tar sands enlargement”; to the Dwelling Oceans Society “to construct opposition to the Kinder Morgan Pipeline”; and to Forest Ethics “to conduct schooling and outreach opposing the Kinder Morgan and Northern Gateway pipelines.”

However the American anti-oilsands funding effort didn’t cease at encouraging opposition to grease pipelines. The Victoria-based Dogwood Initiative acquired tens of millions of dollars from Tides Canada to run get-out-the-vote campaigns within the 2017 B.C. provincial election, together with deploying a throng of marketing campaign staff within the using of Inexperienced Social gathering Chief Andrew Weaver. After his election, the B.C. authorities could be within the palms of an NDP/Inexperienced alliance bent on preventing the Trans Mountain pipeline enlargement.

Cash was additionally funneled to marketing campaign activists working to assist the Liberals win the 2015 election. Vancouver-based Leadnow acquired straight and thru the B.C.-based Sisu Institute greater than $1 million from Tides Canada in the direction of the target of defeating then prime minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative authorities, which supported increasing the oil and gasoline business. Leadnow claims its campaigners helped defeat Conservative candidates in 25 ridings.

If it weren’t for all that American funding directed at a marketing campaign mobilizing First Nations and different anti-pipeline activists, the Liberals may not have been so profitable in working in opposition to the Harper Conservatives; however then, with out the election of an ideologically anti-oilsands Liberal authorities, the funding for the anti-oilsands marketing campaign may not have been sufficient, both. The web site of the Tar Sands Marketing campaign boasted till lately a quote from staff chief Michael Marx: “The controversy from the marketing campaign contributed to political victories on the provincial and nationwide degree in 2015 and led to daring local weather commitments by Canadian leaders.” After the CBC reported this previous January on the marketing campaign (which the Nationwide Submit and Monetary Submit, with Krause’s assist, had been reporting on for years) on The Weekly hosted by Wendy Mesley, Marx’s quote was taken off the marketing campaign’s web site. (The episode may be very a lot price watching.)

Learn the remainder of the story right here.

HT/Bert Ok

Like this:

Like Loading…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *